top of page

Why Podman is Red Hat’s Powerful Alternative to Docker

Updated: Jan 28

 

Table of Contents

 
From Docker to Podman: Why Red Hat’s Container Engine is a Game Changer

Overview

In the world of containerization, Docker has long been the de facto standard for building, shipping, and running applications inside lightweight containers. However, as the container ecosystem evolves, a new contender is gaining traction—Red Hat Podman. With its unique features and advantages, Podman is quickly being recognized as a powerful and versatile alternative to Docker.


In this blog, we’ll explore why Red Hat’s Podman is emerging as a game changer in the container landscape and why it could be the right choice for your next project or enterprise-level deployment.


What is Podman?

Podman, developed by RedHat, is a container management tool that is compliant with the OCI standards and provides functionalities similar to Docker for container management.


One of Podman's standout features is its capability to run rootless containers, allowing users to manage and run containers without requiring root privileges. This enhances security by preventing root access in case of a container compromise. You can learn more about the advantages of rootless containers here.

Note: Docker also offers rootless mode with certain limitations. More information can be found here.

Furthermore, Podman operates without a daemon (unlike Docker) and directly interacts with runc, which executes containers according to OCI specifications. For instance, containers created by user demo-1 using Podman cannot be altered by user demo-2, and vice versa.


Similar to Kubernetes pods, Podman allows the creation of multi-container pods, presenting an intriguing and advanced feature. Moreover, you can export a Podman pod as a Kubernetes manifest and deploy a Podman pod using a Kubernetes pod manifest.


Key Differences Between Podman and Docker

Daemonless Architecture

  • Docker relies on a central daemon (the Docker daemon, dockerd) to manage containers. This daemon runs as a background service and is required for Docker commands to execute. While this architecture works well, it introduces a single point of failure and requires more complex permissions management.

  • Podman, on the other hand, is daemonless. It does not require a long-running background service to manage containers. Each Podman command runs as a separate process, which improves security, simplifies management, and reduces overhead. This architecture allows for more flexibility and control, as users don’t have to worry about managing a long-running service or dealing with daemon-related issues.

Rootless Containers

  • Docker typically requires root privileges to run containers, which means that users must have elevated permissions to execute container-related tasks. This can be a security concern, as it increases the attack surface and risks compromising the system if a vulnerability is exploited.

  • Podman supports rootless containers, meaning that containers can be run by non-privileged users without requiring root access. This significantly reduces security risks, especially when running containers in multi-user environments or shared systems. It also makes Podman a better fit for users in environments where they do not have administrative privileges.

Compatibility with Docker

  • One of the biggest advantages of Podman is its Docker compatibility. Podman’s command-line interface (CLI) is designed to be a drop-in replacement for Docker, meaning that most Docker commands will work in Podman with little to no modification. You can use familiar Docker commands like podman run, podman build, and podman ps without needing to learn a new set of commands.

  • Moreover, Podman also provides support for Docker Compose through tools like Podman Compose, allowing users to manage multi-container applications just as they would with Docker Compose.

Podman and Kubernetes Integration

  • Podman introduces the concept of a "pod," a group of one or more containers that share networking and storage resources. This concept is borrowed from Kubernetes, making it easier to transition from local container environments to cloud-native platforms.

  • Since Kubernetes also operates with pods, Podman users can more easily replicate their production environments locally, streamlining the development-to-production workflow. With Podman, developers can build and test their applications in pod-like environments before pushing them to Kubernetes.

Improved Security Model

  • Docker requires root privileges to perform container operations, which inherently introduces security risks, particularly in multi-tenant or shared environments.

  • Podman provides better security by allowing users to run containers in a rootless mode, meaning no elevated privileges are required. Additionally, Podman leverages SELinux (Security-Enhanced Linux) for access control, which further hardens the security of containerized applications. Podman can also integrate with other Linux security modules like AppArmor, providing flexibility in implementing security policies.

No dependency on Docker Hub

  • Docker relies heavily on the Docker Hub for storing and sharing container images. While Docker Hub is convenient, it is a centralized service, which can be a point of contention in highly regulated or security-sensitive environments.

  • Podman does not have a dependency on Docker Hub. It can pull container images from any registry (Docker Hub, Red Hat’s Quay.io, or private registries) and doesn’t require a default central repository. This flexibility allows for more control over image storage and distribution.

Why Podman is a Game Changer?

Considering these characteristics, the main elements that have led to the swift increase in the popularity of Podman are outlined, positioning it as an innovative power in the field of container technology:

Security By Default

Podman’s rootless containers and daemonless architecture make it a more secure container engine than Docker. It’s particularly appealing in environments that require stringent security policies or in multi-tenant systems where different users need to run containers without exposing the system to potential vulnerabilities.

Seamless Transition from Docker

For teams already familiar with Docker, transitioning to Podman is easy. Since Podman mimics Docker’s CLI, developers can use their existing skills and tooling with minimal effort. This makes Podman an attractive alternative for organizations looking to try something new without a steep learning curve or the need to change their entire workflow.

Better Integration with Kubernetes

Podman’s native pod concept and integration with Kubernetes make it an excellent choice for organizations focused on cloud-native, containerized environments. Developers can use Podman to mirror their Kubernetes pods locally, enhancing the local development experience and enabling smoother transitions to production on Kubernetes clusters.

Flexibility and Control

With Podman, developers have greater control over their container environments. Podman’s ability to run containers without the need for root access and without relying on a background service provides a cleaner, more modular approach to container management. This results in improved efficiency and less complexity, making it an ideal choice for both development and production environments.

Open Source and Enterprise Ready

As an open-source project, Podman offers the flexibility and transparency that many developers and organizations look for in their container engine. Additionally, since it is backed by Red Hat, Podman benefits from enterprise-level support and integration with Red Hat’s suite of cloud-native technologies.


Conclusion

While Docker has been the dominant container engine for years, Podman offers a compelling alternative that addresses key limitations in security, flexibility, and integration. With its daemonless architecture, rootless containers, and Kubernetes-friendly design, Podman is poised to become a game changer in the containerization landscape. Whether you’re a developer looking for a more secure and lightweight solution or an enterprise seeking a scalable container platform, Podman offers a robust and modern alternative to Docker.


If you haven’t yet explored Podman, now might be the perfect time to start. The future of containerization is here, and it’s called Podman.


If you found this article helpful, hit subscribe for more in-depth content 🔔, share your thoughts in the comments 💬, and spread the word to others who could benefit 📣! Don’t forget to rate this blog ⭐ to encourage the writer to create more insightful content.

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
average rating is 4 out of 5, based on 150 votes, Recommend it

Subscribe For Updates

Stay updated with the latest cloud insights and best practices, delivered directly to your inbox.

91585408_VEC004.jpg
Collaborate and Share Your Expertise To The World!
Ananta Cloud welcomes talented writers and tech enthusiasts to collaborate on blog. Share your expertise in cloud technologies and industry trends while building your personal brand. Contributing insightful content allows you to reach a broader audience and explore monetization opportunities. Join us in fostering a community that values your ideas and experiences.
business-professionals-exchanging-handshakes.png
bottom of page